The forms of space entrepreneurshipby Alexander William Salter
|
| Economists have identified three major forms of entrepreneurship. Space entrepreneurs practice all of them. |
SpaceX is obviously important—the most important space business, in fact. It’s already lowered launch costs by a factor of ten from the Space Shuttle era, and Starship could do it again. But it’s hardly the only actor worth watching in the ongoing commercial space revolution. Although SpaceX’s executives (to say nothing of Elon Musk) have plenty of commercial savvy, its smaller, scrappier cousins often provide a clearer view of entrepreneurial forces at work.
The modern space industry is an ideal laboratory of entrepreneurship. From Planet’s constellation of shoebox-sized satellites photographing every spot on Earth, to Rocket Lab’s precision-engineered rockets reaching orbit after just two tries, to the repeated setbacks and eventual milestones of Firefly, the first business to soft-land on the Moon while keeping its craft upright, we’re witnessing an industry brimming with vitality and eager to conquer the final frontier of commerce.
This isn’t your father’s space industry. As observers like Eric Berger and Ashlee Vance have shown, contemporary aerospace is the Hawaiian-shirt successor to the button-down legacy contractors. Space entrepreneurs must combine audacious dreams with pitiless precision—a pairing that illuminates core principles of entrepreneurial theory.
Economists have identified three major forms of entrepreneurship. Space entrepreneurs practice all of them.
First, they’re engines of creative destruction in Joseph Schumpeter’s sense, using innovative technologies to make traditional aerospace approaches obsolete. Companies like Planet deploy hundreds of cheap, small satellites to observe the Earth. This was economically unachievable under the old government paradigm of infrequent launches with hundred-million-dollar payloads. Rocket Lab achieved reliable orbital launches with half as many attempts as SpaceX, demonstrating how entrepreneurial innovation can leapfrog established methods.
Second, these entrepreneurs are uncertainty-bearers in Frank Knight’s and Ludwig von Mises’s conception, willing to stake their fortunes on ventures where the probability of success is unknowable. Firefly, an all-purpose space company that fought its way back from the dead, has secured numerous lucrative government contracts—yet its engineering accomplishments are more impressive than its financial statements. Mission success is no guarantee of viability, and traditional risk assessments simply don’t apply.
Third, space entrepreneurs exhibit the alertness to profit opportunities that Israel Kirzner emphasized, spotting market gaps that established players missed. They recognized that the traditional aerospace industry’s slow, bureaucratic, government-forward approach left piles of dollars on the sidewalk. They did what the incumbents couldn’t: pick them up. Getting back to SpaceX, this is their literal origin story. Musk decided to build his own rockets after assessing the costs of their components, recognizing there was a quasi-arbitrage opportunity from turning undervalued inputs into industry-changing outputs.
What makes space entrepreneurship particularly compelling is its human dimension. These founders and their companies are sensational. They risk everything on ventures that most investors would consider insane. Boldness and drive are front and center. The money is great, but there’s something deeper than profit maximization going on here.
The executives, engineers, and investors pushing into space view themselves as pioneers. They’re taking incredible risks in a bid to overcome the limits of nature. Very few people can handle this degree of unpredictability, let alone thrive in it. The psychological dimension reveals an important insight about entrepreneurship: disruptive ventures are often powered by motivations that transcend simple economic calculation. The market provides the knowledge, but the entrepreneur provides the will.
This isn’t just about the private sector. Governments are key figures in this celestial drama, serving as anchor customers and arguably the largest source of demand for commercial services. The goal is to get the market to stand on its own, but we’re not there yet. Governments also regulate launches, monitor their nationals in space, and fulfill international treaty obligations. These functions will remain public, if not forever, then for the foreseeable future.
But while government remains on the field, it isn’t the star player. We can and should be optimistic about the public sector transitioning to a referee-type role, letting entrepreneurial initiative and market forces work their magic. The most successful space ventures have figured out how to work with government customers while maintaining the operational flexibility that bureaucracies lack.
| The space industry showcases the magnificence of free markets: competition that slashes costs, innovation that opens new frontiers, and voluntary exchange that creates wealth for all. |
The economic implications are immense. The space economy is currently worth more than $600 billion and could reach $1.8 trillion by 2035. These numbers represent massive opportunities for wealth creation that will benefit everyone on Earth. Consider how much better our lives will be when we can access satellite internet from any spot on Earth, receive organ transplants from human tissue grown in microgravity conditions, or even spend time in orbit as tourists, seeing the heavens firsthand.
All of this depends on the infrastructure that space entrepreneurs are building right now. The space industry showcases the magnificence of free markets: competition that slashes costs, innovation that opens new frontiers, and voluntary exchange that creates wealth for all.
The commercial space revolution offers several key insights for understanding entrepreneurship more broadly:
Scale matters: Space entrepreneurship demonstrates that transformative ventures often require thinking at scales that defy comprehension. The entrepreneurs who prevail find ways to make the impossible inevitable.
Imagination plus feasibility: Success requires combining engineering discipline with creative vision. Breakthrough ventures manage the tension between accuracy and audacity.
Realism and reform: Even with entrepreneurial vigor, developing new markets requires patience and the ability to work within existing institutions while building new ones.
The drive to thrive: World-historical ventures are motivated by something beyond profit—the desire to explore, to conquer, to be part of something larger than oneself.
As market forces reshape the cosmos, we’re witnessing entrepreneurship theory play out on the grandest possible stage. The commercial space revolution isn’t just about rockets and satellites—it’s about expanding humanity’s horizons to capture the bounty of the universe.
The entrepreneurs building this industry spot opportunities others miss, bear uncertainty others won’t shoulder, and create rather than capture value. The space industry thus serves as an ideal case study for understanding how entrepreneurship works in practice. It demonstrates that even in the most technically demanding, capital-intensive, and physically daunting environments, entrepreneurial dynamism can triumph over bureaucratic inertia to create value on a cosmic scale.
Note: we are now moderating comments. There will be a delay in posting comments and no guarantee that all submitted comments will be posted.