The Space Reviewin association with SpaceNews

book covers

Review: Leaving Earth

Leaving Earth: Space Stations, Rival Superpowers, and the Quest for Interplanetary Travel
by Robert Zimmerman
Joseph Henry Press, 2003
Hardcover, 528pp., illus.
ISBN 0-309-08548-9

Why build a space station? Since the beginning of the Space Age the stations that have flown have fallen short of the ideals of space advocates and science fiction writers, who foresaw orbiting hubs of transportation and commerce—the giant spinning station from 2001: A Space Odyssey, complete with Pan Am shuttles and a Hilton hotel, being perhaps the best-known example. Instead, the space stations that have been built have been, at best, modest conglomerations of modules and solar arrays, serving as cramped homes for two or three people who spend much of their time simply keeping their station operating. The justification for such facilities has been rooted primarily in geopolitics—first Cold War competition, now international cooperation—coated with a thin veneer of science.

Yet there is a far more important purpose for a space station, argues Robert Zimmerman in his book Leaving Earth. Space stations, he believes, are essential proving grounds for the eventual human exploration of the solar system. Space stations allow scientists to find out how people can handle extended periods of weightlessness, as well as how they can—or sometimes can’t—get along with fellow crew members in cramped quarters. Stations also offer an opportunity to develop and test key technologies needed for interplanetary journeys, particularly life support systems, as well as test the resourcefulness of crews to carry out repairs in space. While politicians may have been motivated to fund space stations for foreign policy or other political reasons, the various space stations built and flown to date have gone a long ways towards achieving those exploration goals.

Zimmerman makes this case through a detailed history of American and Russian space station programs. Starting with the prehistory of space stations—the early concepts advocated by the likes of von Braun and Korolev—he works his way chronologically through the progression of Salyut stations that led up to Mir. This history is interrupted to show what the United States was doing at the time in regards to space stations: the short but proud history of Skylab in the early 1970s, and the troubled development of Freedom in the 1980s. These separate histories merge later in the book with the Shuttle-Mir program and the International Space Station.

“Like ships passing in the night,” Zimmerman notes, “the Russians have become freedom-loving capitalists, while the Americans have become xenophobic control-freaks.”

Throughout Leaving Earth Zimmerman notes how the development of these stations has enabled, step by step, human explorations beyond Earth orbit. This includes the ability of humans to spend increasing periods of time in weightlessness—three months, six months, a year and more—with only temporarily affects to their health, as well as the technical achievements of the stations themselves. In addition, he also follows a long-term Russian effort, dating from Salyut 1 and extending through Mir and ISS, to grow plants in space: a key requirement, in all likelihood, of any long-duration human mission to Mars and beyond.

Because Leaving Earth covers events that span more than three decades, Zimmerman also explores how the Russian and American space programs have evolved over that time. He concludes that the two have been, and continue, to move in opposite directions. Russian efforts have gone from the autocratic control of Soviet times to the present day, where Russia is willing to sell seats on Soyuz taxi flights to the ISS and film commercials there, doing whatever it takes to raise the money needed to keep their program alive. NASA, in the meantime, has gone from the can-do days of Apollo to an increasingly centralized, government-controlled present. Zimmerman even compares the internecine squabbles among the NASA field centers for control of the space station program to the disputes between Korolev’s and Chelomey’s design bureaus in the 1960s Soviet Union. “Like ships passing in the night,” he writes, “the Russians have become freedom-loving capitalists, while the Americans have become xenophobic control-freaks.”

Leaving Earth offers perhaps the best single-volume history of space station development yet written. Given how unfamiliar most Americans, even those who consider themselves space advocates, are of Russian space history, this book does a valuable service by introducing them to the cosmonauts who pioneered space station development for decades. One drawback of the book, though, it that it doesn’t include any photographs, only a handful of line drawings of the various space stations flown to date. This keeps the reader from putting a face on many of those people, as well as the space stations they inhabited.

Towards the end of the book Zimmerman argues that the ISS is something of a step backwards from Mir and its predecessors. While those stations were designed to be increasingly independent—“with Mir we almost had a closed loop,” claimed ISS and Mir veteran Sergei Krikalev—ISS is more complex and thus more dependent on ground controllers to operate. Given the vast distances of interplanetary space, where the round-trip travel time for a message and its response is measured in the dozens of minutes, that’s no way to operate. However, since the book’s publication last fall President Bush has introduced a new space policy with the goals of returning humans to the Moon and, eventually, sending them on to Mars. One aspect of that plan is to focus the ISS on life sciences research that directly supports that exploration initiative. While doubtless a disappointment to those who planned to perform material or physical science research on the station, this redirection may put the ISS firmly back on course towards the ultimate goals pioneered by the Salyuts, Skylab, and Mir: to lead humanity into the solar system.


ISPCS 2015